Why People Blame Cds For Recent Financial Crisis Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 15 Words: 4400 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Research paper Did you like this example? This briefing paper provides background on the derivatives markets and their role in the financial crisis, evaluates aspects of the main reform proposals and whether or not these reforms should be implemented. One of the least understood but potentially among the more damaging factors contributing to the crisis in global financial markets is an asset class known as over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and one OTC product in particular known as credit default swaps or CDS. Indeed, even were there not multiple financial market crises underway, reforming the CDS market would still be an urgent problem. Warren Buffett famously described CDSs as weapons of financial mass destruction in Berkshire Hathaways 2002 annual report. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Why People Blame Cds For Recent Financial Crisis Finance Essay" essay for you Create order However, Buffett recently admitted that his company has sold at least 251 derivative contracts with a total face value of more than $14 billion. Buffett says he plans to continue selling CDSs because the odds strongly favor making money. The architecture of derivatives markets is now in play because of two, related policy concerns that arose from the financial crisis: systemic risk and market efficiency. Systemic risk is the danger that failing financial institutions will destabilize the financial system and thereby threaten the wider economy. When unconstrained by effective risk management or regulation, derivatives enable high concentrations of risk in individual financial institutions. Derivatives markets are efficient if trading costs are low and risk is well distributed among investors. The most important ingredient for market efficiency is competition, which in turn depends on price transparency and on relatively unencumbered access to trading by a broad set of market partic ipants. Why people blame CDS for the recent financial crisis? The financial crisis was exacerbated by derivatives markets in two basic ways. First, insurance companies such as AIG, Ambac, and MBIA used CDS to sell protection on CDOs backed by sub-prime mortgages to such an extent that they were severely impaired when those CDOs experienced large losses from mortgage defaults. This in turn contributed to the weaknesses of the banks that had bought and relied upon the protection of these credit default swaps. Second, the failures of the large investment banks Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers were exacerbated by a run of their OTC derivatives counterparties. The flight of these derivatives counterparties, as they sought new positions with other dealers, may also have contributed to the fragility of global financial markets. In the same vein, a number of other large dealer banks had to be bailed out for reasons that included the dangers posed by the potential flights of their derivatives portfolios. The AIG Fiasco AIG, the most egregious ex ample of the first type, was bailed out in response to losses suffered by its subsidiary AIG FP, which had sold CDS protection on over $400 billion of CDOs. As AIGs losses mounted, downgrades to its credit rating were about to trigger contractual obligations for AIG to post large amounts of additional collateral on its CDS positions. AIG did not have the resources to meet these calls for more collateral. The federal government stepped in to support AIG, at a massive cost to U.S. taxpayers. Clearing would not have helped here. The AIG credit derivatives contracts were customized to the particular CDOs that they covered. Even had CDS clearing existed at the time, these AIG CDS would not have been sufficiently standard to have been cleared. Only better risk management by AIG and better regulatory supervision could have prevented this disaster. Flaws in CDS: In my view, CDS and the entire OTC derivatives market represents a form of regulatory arbitrage a retrograde and deliberate evasion of established prudential norms masquerading under the innocent guise of innovation. As in the case for the OTC market for unregistered securitizations, OTC derivatives are essentially designed to generate supernormal returns for a relatively small group of global banks which traffic in these officially sanctioned, but private gaming contracts. The practical problems with CDS contracts come from several basic flaws in the regulatory, legal and business model for these instruments, deliberate flaws that include: An archaic, bilateral clearing scheme that has only recently begun to be reformed, A deliberate lack of standardization and price transparency that advantages the CDS dealer No common central counterparty to guarantee all trades and to hold collateral, and thus no effective limit dealer leverage A schizophrenic pricing methodolog y that has little connection to the several different types of underlying market and credit risk contained in CDS contracts Are the reforms really needed? Reform is necessary to re-establish confidence in the financial system, particularly among global investors. The reform proposal is well thought out, at least in theory; it attempts to fill most of the cracks in the regulatory framework, cracks that contributed significantly to the current financial crisis. Even with the reforms implemented we would have decreased the impact of this financial meltdown. Reforms which are being implemented: BigBang protocol: On March 12, 2009, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA), published the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee and Auction Settlement Supplement (the Supplement) and Protocol (the Big Bang Protocol). The Supplement will introduce four broad changes into the Credit Default Swap (CDS) market that will be applied to new CDS trades and can be applied to existing CDS contracts via adherence to the Big Bang Protocol. Each of these changes is outlined in the discussion below. And these became effective from April 8 2009. The changes made by the ISDA were: Adopts the auction model as the default settlement mechanism based on the documentation used in connection with previous credit derivative auction protocols; Establishes Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees (Determinations Committees) for the purpose of making determinations with respect to credit events and succession events, for overseeing the auction process (and any modification required for a specific credit event) and for addressing other issues presented by the CDS market; Establishes a credit event backstop date and a successor event backstop date; and Modifies currency exchange rates and related provisions for physical settlement and the auction settlement process to eliminate the perceived inequity relating to foreign exchange provisions with respect to the use and amendment of a Notice of Physical Settlement during the settlement of CDS trades. 100/500 Trading style: ISDA has also announced a new Standard North American Corporate CDS contract, nicknamed SNAC. SNAC is a single-name CDS contract with a fixed coupon of 100 or 500 basis points, depending on whether the Reference Entity is considered investment grade (for which the fixed coupon is 100 basis points) or high yield (for which the coupon is 500 basis points). SNAC contracts will also trade without Restructuring as an applicable credit event. Note that adhering to the Big Bang Protocol will not convert existing CDS contracts to SNAC. The Big Bang Protocol and the new SNAC contract are separate ISDA initiatives that will take effect on the same date. Reforms which are being proposed: The three main derivative reform proposals under discussion On July 30, 2009, the chairs of the House Financial Services Committee and the House Agriculture Committee outlined their joint principles for new derivatives legislation (the Frank- Peterson principles) On August 11, 2009, the Obama administration released its proposed Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of 2009 (the Treasury plan) On June 26, 2009, the House passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act (Waxman-Markey), can be evaluated with respect to several stated policy options that are believed, in varying degrees, to reduce systematic risk and improve the efficiency of the derivatives markets. They are: Centralized clearing, Improved price transparency, Improved position transparency, Migration of over-the-counter trading to exchanges, Speculative position limits, and Improved corporate governance in the area of risk management. Centralized clearing: A move towards the centralized clearing of OTC derivatives is an important component of all of the proposed packages of reforms. A contract is cleared when a central clearing counterparty, informally known as a clearing house, legally assumes the position of buyer from the original seller, and seller to the original buyer. The original counterparties post initial performance margin with the clearing house. As the position is marked to market each day, they pay or receive variation margin in recognition of any reductions or increases in the market values of their positions. These margin payments are normally made in cash or treasury securities. Clearing insulates counterparties from each other, provided that the clearing houses are themselves well designed and capitalized. In addition to any direct reductions in counterparty risk, clearing reduces the sort of run-on-the-bank behavior that was likely to have quickened the failures of Bear Stearns and Lehman. The main concern is ho w to encourage the growth of effective central clearing. Clearing is a relatively expensive process. For each type of derivatives contract, a clearing house must set up standard terms for acceptable contracts, determine formulas for initial margins, and set up a methodology for pricing cleared derivatives for the purpose of determining variation margin payments. Proper financial controls and carefully crafted legal contracts are required. Systems for the processing of trades and collateral are needed. Because of these costs and because of the requirement for daily or even more frequent pricing, it only makes sense to clear types of derivatives that are relatively commoditized, that is, widely and heavily traded in a standard form. In July 2009, Eurex began clearing CDS contracts, partly in response to the European Commissions demand that dealers arrange for separate Europe-based clearing of Eurozone credit default swaps. In general, counterparty risk is higher when clearing is separated across clearing houses. This follows from the lost opportunity to offset the exposures that can arise when a financial institutions cleared derivatives positions have a net negative market value at one clearing house and a net positive market value at another clearing house. From this viewpoint, it is better to have a small number of central clearing counterparties, and to have joint clearing of interest-rate swaps, credit default swaps, and other derivatives. National regulators would do well to cooperate on the regulation and supervision of clearing houses. Among the issues to be resolved for the effective international supervision of clearing houses is the division of responsibility for bailouts, should a clearing house need government support. Overall, while the clearing of inter-dealer OTC derivatives positions is still quite limited, the clearing of positions between dealers and their customers is even less common. The New York Fed has asked dealers to arrange fo r more clearing of customer positions. The development of new frameworks for clearing customer-to-dealer CDS positions is in progress. In summary, the increased use of central clearing represents the most powerful way to reduce systemic risk arising from OTC derivatives markets. Some key steps that regulators should take are: (1) pressuring dealers to adopt specific numerical targets for lowering exposures (before collateral) on uncleared derivatives positions, (2) increasing regulatory capital requirements for uncleared versus cleared derivatives, (3) persuading dealers to clear a greater fraction of dealer-to-customer positions, and (4) fostering international coordination in the regulation, supervision, and failure resolution of clearing houses. It would be counterproductive, in my opinion, for regulators to reach for legal definitions of the types of derivatives that are to be cleared. Improved Price Transparency: Markets tend to be more efficient when the going price is well known by market participants. OTC derivatives markets have limited price transparency. For relatively standard types of derivatives, such as certain interest-rate swaps and credit default swaps, representative quotes are published through financial reporting services such as Markit Partners and Bloomberg, or on inter-dealer broker screens. Customers of dealers are nevertheless normally much less well informed about recent execution prices than are the dealers with whom they execute their trades, and are thus at a bargaining disadvantage to the dealers. This is not a big issue from the viewpoint of systemic risk, but it is a relevant concern with respect to market efficiency and the division of gains from trade between dealers and their customers. But on the other side from dealers point of view with more improved price transparency would reduce the incentives of dealers to make markets because the customers will be h aving the price of previously traded contract and in the end reduce market liquidity. Improved Position Transparency: A separate issue is the availability of data on the sizes of derivatives positions, which allow the monitoring of risk concentrations that can have systemic implications. There are concerns, however, about what amount and type of data is appropriate to be disclosed, and to whom. The Treasury plan and the Frank-Peterson principles call for all OTC derivative trades to be reported to qualified trade registries. The Treasury plan also calls for public disclosure of aggregate position information, and proposes that individual positions should not be disclosed. Aggregate position information Public disclosure of market-aggregated position sizes seems well warranted. Currently, for example, for each of 1,000 large corporate or sovereign borrowers, DerivServ discloses the total quantity of CDS positions that are held as protection against the default of the borrower. This open interest information assists investors in judging the degree to which investors, in aggregate, are concerned about the creditworthiness of individual borrowers, as well as the degree to which sellers of protection in the CDS market could be harmed, in aggregate, if the borrower defaults. The BIS, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, ISDA, and other agencies provide some aggregate market position information, although the frequency of these reports and their coarse levels of aggregation leave room from significant improvements in the information that investors can collect on OTC market risks. Regulators should push, in broad set of active OTC derivatives markets, for something akin to t he frequency (weekly) and degree of refinement of DerivServ open-interest reporting. For example, had the DerivServ Trade Information Warehouse, which now provides electronic documentation of almost all standard CDS contracts, not existed by the time of the financial crisis, the default of Lehman Brothers would probably have been accompanied by substantially greater market uncertainty, and potentially by panic as dealers and others attempted to determine the extents of their CDS exposures. In fact, the CDS positions triggered by Lehmans default were well documented and were settled in an orderly manner. All recorded sellers of protection performed on their obligations. Individual position information It is sometimes claimed that OTC derivatives pose dangerous risks because the public does not have the opportunity to see the sizes of positions held by individual investors. OTC derivatives markets are no more opaque in this respect than organized derivatives exchanges. Indeed, individual positions are almost never disclosed in any financial markets. The main exception is the SEC requirement for investors in the common shares of public corporations to disclose holdings once they exceed given thresholds, relative to the total number of outstanding shares. These equity position disclosures are not motivated by systemic risk monitoring, but are instead designed to address issues related to the potential control of U.S. corporations. Derivatives positions do not convey control. In general, the public disclosure of individual derivatives positions would reduce the incentives of investors to collect and analyze fundamental information. The efficiency with which prices are determined would decline correspondingly. Privacy concerns might also be raised. The public disclosure of individual derivatives positions should not be mandated as an approach to reducing systemic risk unless there is compelling evidence that disclosure to regulators alone is not sufficient. There is, however, a good case for mandating the public disclosure of derivatives positions (whether obtained on exchanges or over the counter) that offset the economic exposures of major holders of debt or equity in public corporations. For example, the public has an interest in discovering whether a major shareholder, who ostensibly contributes to proper corporate governance, has severely diluted its governance incentives through a derivatives position. Likewise, the major creditors of a distressed corporation are normally presumed to act in a manner that mitigates distress costs. If, however, a creditor has purchased protection against default using credit derivatives, the creditor may even have a n et incentive to accelerate the default or may have a substantially diluted interest in raising the recovery value of debt claims. In general, regulators should rationalize disclosure requirements for derivatives positions that raise substantial concerns over moral hazard in corporate governance. Migration of derivatives trading onto exchanges: Because derivatives traded on exchanges have almost immediate price transparency and are almost invariably cleared, exchanges offer obvious improvements over OTC trading for those types of derivatives that have enough volume of trade to justify the setup costs of exchange trading. Once traded on exchanges, moreover, a broader set of investors can take part in the benefits of hedging and speculation, and can further add to market efficiency and, particularly, liquidity. Dealers, however, reap substantial profits from OTC trading, and have little incentive to foster the migration of trading from the OTC market to exchanges, even after a derivative product achieves a high level of standardization and breadth of investor activity. Anyone suggesting otherwise should be embarrassed by the examples of standardized and extremely heavily traded derivatives that are available only in the OTC market, such as CDX.NA.IG default-swap index derivatives, which are based on a basket of bonds iss ued by large investment-grade North American corporations. I can think of no good reason that the public interest is best served by having such benchmark financial products available only through negotiation with dealers. There also exist electronic trading platforms that offer a degree of price transparency and breadth of access lying between the extremes represented by fully private OTC negotiation and central exchange trading. These platforms are organized by dealers, inter-dealer brokers, or specialty financial services firms such as TradeWeb or BrokerHub. On such platforms, dealers compete for orders by displaying quotes. Typically, counterparties can contact other counterparties offering quotes, and then complete the negotiation of trades in private. More extensive use of electronic trading platforms and of TRACE-like price transparency would reduce the inefficiencies associated with OTC market opaqueness. Indeed, the Treasury plan would require that all standardized der ivatives be traded on exchanges or on alternative swap execution facilities, apparently referring to trading platforms of the sort mentioned above. Forcing derivatives trading onto exchanges by regulation must nevertheless be done with caution. It is not easy to gauge the costs and benefits, case by case. Simple rules based on measured volume might encourage unintended behavior by dealers, such as using excessive customization to limit the development of liquidity. Further, even for relatively high-volume products, OTC markets are sometimes able to handle very large trade sizes more easily than exchanges, just as large blocks of equities are often handled by private negotiation despite the availability of active equity exchanges. Beneficial financial innovation could also be stifled if OTC derivatives are regulated onto exchanges before dealers can generate a sufficient return on their investment in developing new financial products. Curbing Speculative Trade: It has been proposed that speculative derivatives trading should be severely curbed, or even in the case of CDS markets outlawed. These proposals are based, at least in part, on a misconception of the role of speculation. The U.S. House of Representatives has voted in favor of Waxman-Markey, which, if passed without alteration, would prevent an investor from entering into a credit default swap unless the investor has an associated commercial business exposure to the borrower named in the CDS. (The disallowed trade has been called a naked CDS.) This measure is seriously flawed. If it is enacted, an investor that does have a commercial hedging need for CDS protection would often face difficulty finding a suitable counterparty. Apparently, the counterparty would also be legally required to have a commercial need to hedge against the default of the same borrower. The elimination of speculation through this measure is analogous to regulation against hurricane insurance. Insurers have no natural hedging motive in offering hurricane insurance. They are effectively speculators. That is, they believe that the likelihood of a hurricane is low enough relative to the insurance premium that they can generate an expected profit on each new policy, although taking the risk of a significant loss in the event of a hurricane. To the extent that insurers are prevented from speculating in this manner, those with a desire to reduce risk by purchasing insurance would lose access to counterparties willing to bear the risk, or would pay a much larger insurance premium given the resulting scarcity of risk-bearing capacity. A related measure, proposed by George Soros and included as a legislative option in the Frank-Peterson principles, would allow speculators to sell default protection but not to buy default protection. Such a rule would lead to a loss of market liquidity and a reduced quality of price discovery. Suppose, for example, that the CDS market currently offers p rotection on a named borrower at a premium that is much lower than the borrowers poor financial condition actually warrants. Under the proposed regulation, speculators would not have the incentive to discover the true financial health of the borrower, buying protection until the market price of protection rises, thereby revealing the weakness of the borrower to everyone. Outlawing the speculative use of credit default swaps to buy protection would have the unintended consequences of reducing market liquidity (because those selling protection would have less incentive to incur the costs of remaining informed and active traders) and of driving this form of speculation under the radar, through the use of less effective and transparent types of financial products. There are no specific regulatory limits on the sizes of OTC derivatives positions that may be held by a hedge fund, although dealers holding the other sides of these positions indirectly limit systemic risk to some extent t hrough their own limits on counterparty exposures and with the collateral requirements that they impose on hedge funds. Through laws that prohibit price manipulation, the SEC and the CFTC already have an adequate legal framework for pursuing anyone attempting to corner or otherwise manipulate organized securities or derivatives markets. For example, both the CFTC and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) charged Amaranth with market manipulation over its natural gas futures positions. The proposed Treasury plan includes several new measures designed to limit manipulation of OTC derivatives markets, mainly with respect to trading on alternative swap execution facilities. Improved corporate governance in the area of risk management: Derivatives that are not easily cleared or exchange traded are typically those customized to suit the specific business uses of investors. There should be some tolerance for financial innovation and customization. Economic efficiency is harmed if those with commercial needs for hedging are forced entirely into standard derivatives positions that are relatively poor hedges, or if derivatives markets are unable to innovate along with changes in the economy. For example, when interest-rate swaps first appeared in the 1980s, they were low-volume customized financial instruments. Had non-standard derivatives been heavily penalized at that time, a useful financial innovation could have been stifled. The AIG derivatives fiasco was extremely costly to taxpayers. The AIG credit default swaps would not have been sufficiently standard to be cleared. By their nature, the risks of customized derivatives are more difficult to monitor than those of standard derivatives. Risk management by AIGs senior management and board, and supervision by the regulator of its derivatives activities, the Office of Thrift Supervision, were inadequate. In my opinion, corporate boards and regulatory supervisors should have more effective risk management credentials or training. The quality of risk management by corporate boards might also be raised by the increased use of professional services in risk auditing, in the manner that boards currently rely on independent financial accounting auditors. Rules should be flexible to allow for and react to changes in markets: Policymakers should keep in mind that markets evolve. Markets cannot be created by government fiat, and they are distorted by government intervention.Where regulation is necessary, it should be flexible enough to allow continued market evolution and to respond to that evolution in appropriate ways. Sound regulation interacts with markets rather than insisting that markets conform to preconceived government categories and jurisdictions.While central clearing for many CDS contracts is now feasible, regulations should remain sufficiently flexible to allow new or revised credit products to trade and develop in non-cleared markets.Over time, successful products will develop sufficient volume and standardization to permit clearing or exchange trading. However, imposing such requirements on new products when they are initiated initiated would prevent useful experimentation and market evolution.Those who would disrupt derivatives market improvements by mandating a change in regulatory juri sdiction should be required to meet the high burden of proof that the regulatory disruption is both necessary and likely to improve current arrangements. The House Agriculture Committees proposal to restrict derivative clearing to CFTC-regulated clearinghouses fails both prongs of this test. Conclusion: In order to reduce systemic risk arising in derivatives markets, regulators should push for more extensive clearing through immediate pressure on dealers for numerical targets and, as soon as possible, through revisions to regulatory capital requirements. Regulatory language that defines the specific types of derivatives to be cleared would have counterproductive unintended consequences. Derivatives positions should be comprehensively disclosed to regulators, and should be disclosed to the public only after aggregation, except for cases in which the disclosure of specific individual positions would inform the public about significant moral hazards in corporate governance. In order to improve market efficiency, over-the-counter prices should be published much more systematically, for example through TRACE-like post-trade reporting systems, which should be mandated for at least all cleared derivatives. Greater competition, even within the OTC market, can be achieved with more effe ctive and widespread use of electronic trading platforms. Regulators should foster the migration of trading from over-the-counter markets to exchanges whenever warranted by sufficiently active trading. Severe curbs on speculation detract from market efficiency and increase price volatility. Speculative position limits should be adopted only where valid concerns over systemic risk or market manipulation cannot be addressed by other means. Corporate boards should be encouraged to improve their corporate governance in the area of risk management, for example from increased representation on boards of suitable specialists or by the retention of professional risk auditors. All that I am suggesting today is that we bring the CDS market fully into the light of transparency by listing most of these contracts on exchanges, that we require adequate capital and collateral for all players in both exchange and OTC markets, for end users and dealers alike; and that we force parties writing def ault protection to show that they understand the risk implications of same.

The Great Gatsby and the American Dream - 1401 Words

The Real American Dream Since its institution, the United States has been revered as the ultimate land of ceaseless opportunity. People all around the world immigrated to America to seek quick wealth, which was predominately seen in the new Modern era. Beginning in the late 1800s to the early 1900s, the period introduced progressive ideas into society and the arts. Accompanying these ideas was a loss of faith in the American Dream and the promise America once guaranteed, especially after World War I. One of the renowned writers, F. Scott Fitzgerald, emerged during this period and put together The Great Gatsby â€Å"embodying†¦the fluid polarities of American experience: success and failure, illusion and disillusion, dream and nightmare†,†¦show more content†¦However, Fitzgerald implies through his diction, that the mansion also is portrayed as an idea, which serves one purpose: to win Daisy back. By defining Gatsbys mansion as a colossal affair by any standard†¦or rather†¦it was a mansion inhabited by a gentleman of the name, Fitzgerald suggests that Gatsby does not own the house, but rather the house or the idea owns Gatsby, and that there is no substance in his vision(Fitzgerald 9). Also, he states that the mansion is a representation of a shortsighted American Dream: that material success†¦will bring one status and happiness†¦, and shows material gain as insignificant when compared to one’s true feelings and emotions (Morton-Mollo Online). Moreover, Fitzgerald hesitates to mentions the word home during his description adding to the purpose Gatsby intends for the mansion, rather than the realism of an actual home. Also, the â€Å"obscene† word left on Gatsby’s front steps , although erased, prove Fitzgerald’s condemnation of the idea, but not the individual of Gatsby, because â€Å"after Nick’s act of erasure, Gatsby’s elusiveness, corruption†¦are forgotten†, yet the elusivenes s and corruption of the American Dream still hold valid (Will Online). Fitzgerald asserts that Gatsbys home parallels his persona - grand, mysterious, andShow MoreRelatedThe American Dream : The Great Gatsby Essay1568 Words   |  7 PagesThe American Dream: The Great Gatsby The Great Gatsby is a tragic love story on the surface, but its most commonly understood as a suspicious critic of the American Dream. In the novel Jay Gatsby overcomes his poor past to gain an incredible amount of money and a limited amount of social cache of in the 1920s NYC, only to be rejected by the â€Å"old money† crowd. The focus of my paper would be the pathway towards the American Dream and how it affects the person and others around. The American dreamRead MoreThe Great Gatsby and the American Dream1442 Words   |  6 PagesPursuit of Happiness. This sentiment can be considered the foundation of the American Dream, the dream that everyone has the ability to become what he or she desires to be. While many people work to attain their American dream, others believe that the dream is seemingly impossible to reach, like F. Scott Fitzgerald. Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby examines the Jazz-Age generations search for the elusive American Dream of wealth and happiness an d scrutinizes the consequences of that generationsRead MoreThe American Dream ( The Great Gatsby )1173 Words   |  5 PagesSLIDE. *POINTS TO PICTURE LIVING IN THE AMERICAN DREAM (THE GREAT GATSBY). Did anyone notice anything that caused a change in society between these two pictures? *POINTS TO SOMEONE WITH ONE OF THE ANSWERS TO THE QUIZ/QUESTION. READS OUT THE RAPID ECONOMIC BOOMING AND GREED. *NEXT SLIDE. That’s correct! During the 1920s of the Jazz Age in concurrence with the â€Å"Roaring Twenties†, America had experienced a rapid economic booming after World War I. The American society experienced an economic and politicalRead MoreThe Great Gatsby American Dream1414 Words   |  6 Pagesfilm is based on the novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald. It follows Jay Gatsby, a man who molds his life around one desire: to be reunited with Daisy Buchanan, the love he lost five years earlier. Gatsby s quest leads him from poverty to wealth, into the arms of his beloved, and eventually to death. Nick Caraway is the narrator, or storyteller, of The Great Gatsby, as well as Daisy s cousin who happens to live next door to Great Gatsby. Daisy represents the paragon of perfection. She has the aura of charmRead MoreThe Great Gatsby and the American Dream773 Words   |  3 Pagesimportant items. The American Dream is a huge achievement that everyone wants to reach. Whether people want to admi t it or not, it is a symbol all it’s self. It can be anything really, a great job, a family, white picket fence, even music or attending concerts of your favorite band. The American Dream is something that makes you so happy and what you can achieve or want achieve in your lifetime. The main AMerican Dream is money, a family, and happiness. In The Great Gatsby the american dream is a green lightRead MoreAmerican Dream In The Great Gatsby1366 Words   |  6 PagesThe American Dream has various implications for diverse individuals. For some people, the concept implies that one can accomplish his or her objectives and goals through living this dream. To others, it provides a beacon of hope, as an open door that individuals desperately desire to enter in pursuit of opportunities. The Americans after World War I, boosted by the emotions of the war, had an uncontrollable vigor about accomplishing and displaying an extravagant way of life and achieving a high socialRead MoreThe Gre at Gatsby : The American Dream927 Words   |  4 Pages2017 The Poor Man’s Dream Many believe that America is the land of riches, where anyone can become rich and wealthy. This idea is known as the American Dream, a set of ideals in which freedom includes the opportunity for a successful living. However, this ethos is completely false, and is nothing more than exactly that - a dream. Throughout the award-winning work of F. Scott Fitzgerald, â€Å"The Great Gatsby†, he gathers criticism about the American Dream. He denounces the dream by shedding the lightRead MoreThe Great Gatsby And The American Dream1771 Words   |  8 Pages 5/30/17 Of Gatsby and His Unattainable Dream The American dream is a concept that has been wielded into American literature throughout history. Projecting the contrast between the American dream and reality, F. Scott Fitzgerald incorporates his opinions, primarily based off of his experiences and tribulations in World War I, throughout his literary works.Many people believe that deplorable moral and social values have evolved from the materialistic pursuit of the American dream especially throughoutRead MoreThe Great Gatsby and the American Dream592 Words   |  2 PagesRed, white , and blue are iconic to the American culture we know of. They can show our passion, desire, and pride for our country, but you will always have you might have to give in, against what your morals tell you.In the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Fitzgerald uses the colors red, blue, and white to symbolize the American dream. To accomplish the American dream you need passion and desire but you will face situations where your morals will compromised. Passion is a necessityRead MoreThe Great Gatsby And The American Dream1514 Words   |  7 Pagesevents, like the great migration movements to Angel and Ellis Island, proved America’s status as the homeland for success. Yet, as literature pieces from the time demonstrate, like The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the great â€Å"American Dream† ideology had been watered down by social hierarchy and sculpted by those at the head for those at the tail. These pieces have also played a large role in the stereotype of the philosophy. Contrary to popularized belief, the American Dream no longer falls

Janoskians Free Essays

The Janoskians are a group of 5 boys that are taking the world by storm! The Janoskians = Just, Another, Name, Of, Silly, Kids, In, Another, Nation. (Skip). The boys became known to the media and public and branded as ‘The YouTube and Online Sensations’ in late March last year when their Meet Greet and Luna Park, Melbourne, had a turn up of over 6000 fans and had to be closed down. We will write a custom essay sample on Janoskians or any similar topic only for you Order Now They now have over 550K subscribers to their main YouTube channel – The Janoskians – with almost 56 million views to date on one channel alone!! They have caught the attention of Sony, MTV, are partnered with YouTube and have just signed with the likes of Keek and various other social platforms. The boys were also recently approached by the Moreland City Council Mayor, OscarYildez (Vic) and are proud to say that they have now joined forces with the ‘Bully Free Australia Foundation’ (in which they promote awareness against bullying) are anti-bullying Board Members and Ambassadors for all online social networks that they are involved with. This campaign also reaches schools, workplaces and the wider community. Involved in this campaign include the likes of Pink, Melbourne Victory Football Club, EDFL, ACG and many other high profile celebrities and businesses. The Janoskians recently released their first single being ‘Set this world on Fire’ with 3 more songs to be released in the next few months! The boys have just completed touring and performing in the ‘Summer Night’s Tour’ with Reece Mastin and The Justice Crew which was a great success and something the boys will never forget. The Janoskians look forward to now travel overseas to meet the ever growing Janoskian fan base all over the world! The boys have made 8 episodes with MTV including many ‘bonus’ and ‘bloopers’ clips added – in association with their show: www. mtv. com. au/thejanoskians. The show has now reached the UK and has attracted interest from Canada, Sweden and many other countries and no doubt will go global this year with MTV which is very exciting! On Saturday, March 16, 2013, the boys will be attending the â€Å"Ribbon Cutting Ceremony† by the Honourable Prime Minister Julia Gillard who will be officially launching the Anti Bullying Australia Foundation! How to cite Janoskians, Papers

Resource Allocation Strategy for Innovation Portfolio Management

Question: Discuss about the Resource Allocation Strategy for Innovation Portfolio Management. Answer: Literature Review The authors cited clear literature reviews which are available within each section of study. Proper titles are also used to elaborate different parameters and show their effectiveness. The various sections into which the research is divided are: Theory Resource Allocation breadth Selectiveness Innovative intent Data and methods Measures Estimation Results Discussion Conclusion The centre point of the journal is the inclusion of data and analysis sheet within the study material. The results show a correlation table depicting the relationship between various factors which effects the decision of innovation portfolio management. Some examples are new product sales, size of the firm, process innovation, innovation expenditure etc. The correlation table specifies how each and every factor gets affected by the decision and shows the viability of a decision. Further, an analysis has been given for various models including NEW, NTF and NTM models. Thus, the overall picture has been described which should get affected when a business needs to invest in new portfolio. The journal shows the idea of selecting a portfolio based on the size and selectiveness of the projects and the data analysis further reinforces the conclusion drawn. The literature review as presented by the research is full of information. However, the information given in the literature review is not up to date. The researcher properly referenced the literature review but incorporates data that are dated 1985, 1997, 1981, 2002, 2000 and some older years. While carrying out the literature review, the researcher made it sure to incorporate all the aspects of innovation that the readers should know. The authors talk about the resource allocation breadth that talks about the parallelization of allocations of resources so that every organization is able to get equal amount of resources to bring in the innovation. Selectiveness is all about allocation resource when the research is going on. Resources are allocated based on the importance of the importance of the individual project. Due to selective resource allocation, there is discrimination for resources among the projects as the resource allocated will be different for each type of project. The in novation intent is related to the intention of the organization to bring in the innovation. The readers might not be knowing the various ways of resource allocation. The literature review throws light on the resource allocation strategies that will help the organization to bring in different types of innovation. Hypothesis This research tested hypothesis about what factors cumulatively derive a prudent decision for effective and objective portfolio management in an innovative environment. The theory well describes the commonly adopted methods which may lead to a complete failure of a project. The authors very well described the need for a portfolio while taking an investment decision especially which scarce and limited resources. The resource allocation breadth has been described as one of the important decisions. The importance of availability of a wide range of projects for making a portfolio has been considered. The authors considered prior research conducted on the topic and concluded that more and more availability of projects may lead to overstretching which can be effectively curbed by adopting the selective approach. This idea has been well developed and depicted as a major and centric approach. Objectives The study sought to achieve the following objectives- How new product sales are affected by the decision of innovative portfolio management. Allocation of resources to the wide range of available projects. How an approach to test the overall effect of a portfolio and non analysis of individual projects may determine the credibility of a business Is the data produced by the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) be utilized for deriving useful results for portfolio management. Is the breadth of the portfolio has greater impact than the selectiveness or a balanced approach needs to be followed. Whether the innovative intent visualized by an organization has been able to be achieved by the designed portfolio. Whether firms should invest in greater projects initially and switch to limited projects which are performing well. Research questions are not given in the article. Every article should have research questions so that the readers would be able to understand the areas that the researcher will investigate or in other words find the answers to the questions. If the researcher would have put the research questions, it would have been easier for the readers to identify the areas that the research is putting the focus on. Methodology The treatment followed a study based on factorization of the effectiveness of an innovative portfolio and its success. The journal depicts short emphasis on each and every factor namely- breadth of the projects, selectiveness and innovative intent of a business. These three factors are considered the pillars of the discussion. Further, the authors used sample method to prove their research outcome. The 2009 Mannheim Innovation Panel conducted a survey for the period 2006-2008 which was a part of the European Community Innovation Survey. A journal from the Oslo Manual has also been referred in the work. The Oslo Manual provides an annual survey of firms providing a wide range of record for check on the consistency of the projects. The sample chosen by the authors has 35,197 enterprises. The authors also analyzed the data in the light of dependent, independent variables and control variables. The research design as applied by the researcher is appropriate for the research. The researcher took into consideration both secondary data and primary data. The secondary data is described properly in the literature review. The primary data is being analyzed with the help of co-relational method. As the authors are trying to find the relation between resource allocation and innovation portfolio management, co-relational analysis seemed to the best choice by the authors. The analysis will help the authors find out the relation between the two. Findings The introductory part demonstrates the objective of the research which shows that the journal particularly discussed about the approach to be followed when a business wants to invests in some innovative intent with the potential to generate more future profits. The decision particularly relies on a number of factors which are highlighted by the authors. A brief discussion about each factor further enhances the correct objective selection for the journal. Each discussion describes how it affects the management of a portfolio of an innovative investment along with the strengths and weaknesses of utilizing that factor. The solutions and related articles and works are also cited along with the research of authors to strengthen the vision of the journal. The data referred by the authors to base their findings was authentic and well accepted. The sample taken depicts a proper survey of businesses who wants to step in the innovative market and make a mark of success in their work histories. Each and every part of the sample and other works has been mentioned with proper source citing and the authentication of the sources. A short introduction about the sources has also been given to strengthen the findings. The variable method was adopted to show that the results derived by the research are well tested and proved. The novelty of new products has been tested using three categories viz. NTM (new to market), NTF (new to firm) and NEW (new and improved products). A ratio of the investment capability of a firm to its new products has been calculated and evaluated to depict the innovation appetite of a firm and the ability of smaller firms to diversify by investing in new projects. The estimation was done on the basis of Tobit analysis method. Split sample or split variables analysis was performed to measure the changing effects breadth under various situations. A proper analysis has been done of different variables under multiple situations and correlation among them has been analyzed and reported in the journal. Thus, proper statistical tools have been used by the authors to reach the final conclusion. All the works and analysis of the authors are properly shown in the journal so that the reader can understand the pros and cons of each and every factor and understand the viability of the decision. The data analysis part of the article is presented well by the authors. The researcher has mentioned the data and the analysis of the data properly. The researcher has mainly discusses three types of allocation strategies in innovation. The authors have mentioned all the aspects of the different tables that have been based on the three factors. The readers would not face any issue to understand the data that has been set by the researchers and they would easily understand the types of analysis that has been incorporated in the article. The presentation of the data has made it easier for the readers to relate them with the discussion and the result that have been mentioned in the article. The researcher has not forgotten to relate the analysis with the result of the article. The models that are being evaluated by the author are being controlled for principle industry membership. The authors revaluated the data by rerunning the model by an augmented operationalization of breadth. The outcome of the analysis show that the result that has been concluded is consistent and hence the research can be said to be successful. The limitation of the research has been addressed in the article properly. The best part of the research is that the researcher has incorporated scope for the future research along with the limitations of the research. The readers will know that the limitation of the present research will help in understanding the areas where further they could further carry out the research. The future researcher will get to know the issues that they could face while carrying out future research. The authors have said that the authors could not evaluate the quality of information that is added in strategy. The authors could not have any control over the resources that are being fed in the strategy. The innovations will vary based on the quality of the ideas. If research is being done on single industry context then the result between the performance and portfolio resource allocation breadth might have been different. Recommendation "Additional research is needed in other statistical settings to see if consistent findings about breadth analysis, requirement of innovative intent, selectiveness and attitude are achieved." However, the journal properly analysis various aspects of an innovative market culture and how different parameter need to be drawn before taking the portfolio and investment decisions. The analysis of the factors under different other statistical scenarios may provide different results than what is derived by the authors. The strength of the journal lies in the base formation which is made up of an authenticated survey which cannot be nullified in any sense but the dynamic business era may provide changing results under different situations and during different period of time. Thus, another measurement tools and references must be followed before concluding anything. Conclusions Conclusions and implications were formulated with the knowledge that subjects for this study used breadth and selectiveness extensively for selecting a perfect innovation portfolio. In this investigation, final examination scores were independent of the method of testing. The method of testing was not a determinant of how business should particularly follow a path while investing in an innovation portfolio. Since time required was not consistent over the two replications, the methods of testing as well as other factors appear to influence the time requirements of test completion. Overall Critique This was a very in-depth research project, particularly for a journal article. For the most part, it was well written and well organized. There was a definite need for a short review of literature to develop the situation. The article did get a little complicated in the reporting of data due to the complicated statistical procedures used. Overall, it was a very interesting, significant contribution to the field of research.